In academic research, there is a subtle trap that many students fall into, not in failing to choose a theoretical framework, but in choosing one and then abandoning it. After the effort of crafting Chapter 2, too many postgraduate researchers treat the theoretical framework like a decorative feature, a once-off intellectual exercise never to be touched again. But the truth is, the strength of your framework depends not on how well you introduce it, but on how consistently you carry it through every stage of your thesis.
Dr. Gilbert explains, “Many students treat the framework as a requirement, not a tool. They write it once, then forget to use it when making sense of their findings. This disconnect creates a thesis that feels fragmented.” According to Dr. Gilbert, this is where so many strong theses fall short, not because the data isn’t rich, but because the theoretical lens is absent when it matters most.
At M&G Research, Dr. Muringa is even more direct: “Your framework should echo throughout your thesis. If it doesn’t appear in your methodology, analysis, or conclusion, then you haven’t written a framework. You’ve just quoted one.” He insists that the real power of a theoretical or conceptual framework is not in naming it but in applying it to shape your methods, your interpretations, and your conclusions.
Let’s explore what that looks like in practice.
Connecting theory to your Research Questions and Objectives is very important, as once you have chosen your framework, it should be visible in the very questions you ask. For example, if you are using Feminist Theory, your questions should reflect concerns with power, voice, and gendered experience. If your framework is rooted in Constructivism, your objectives should signal an interest in meaning-making and subjective interpretation.
This alignment does not happen by accident, you must deliberately build it in. Your framework guides what matters in your study. additionally, it defines what you are looking for and what counts as a valid insight.
Letting Theory Shape Your Methodology
The choice of framework should always inform how you gather data. Dr Muringa reminds students that “a critical theory approach isn’t just about what you analyse, it’s about how you engage with participants.” For example, using Participatory Action Research (PAR) or decolonial frameworks should lead to inclusive methods, co-construction of meaning, and attention to power dynamics during data collection.
Interpreting Data Through Theoretical Lenses
The most important and overlooked stage when it comes to applying your theoretical framework in the study is the data analysis chapter. This is where the framework must be alive. A student using the Theory of Planned Behaviour, for instance, should not only identify behaviour patterns in interviews, but also analyse them through the lenses of intention, attitude, subjective norms, and perceived control. Without this link, analysis becomes descriptive, not analytical.
Dr. Gilbert advises students to code their data using their theoretical concepts. “Don’t just identify what participants say, ask how their responses confirm, challenge, or extend the theory,” he says.
Returning to Your Framework in the Discussion Chapter
It is crucial that you return to the framework in the Discussion Chapter, as after presenting your results, your discussion chapter is the moment to revisit the framework, not to re-explain it, but to test it. It is advisable to always ask yourself this: Does my data confirm the framework? Does it reveal its limitations? Does it invite adaptation or suggest a need for theoretical expansion?
The Discussion chapter in your research is where the theory breathes. It moves from a tool of framing to a site of intellectual dialogue. “A good thesis doesn’t just apply a framework,” says Dr. Muringa. “It contributes back to it.”
The theoretical framework, when well applied, becomes the skeleton of your thesis. It holds your ideas in place. It aligns your research with established thoughts while making room for your own voice. Most importantly, it keeps the work grounded in the abstract, additionally, it roots the inquiry in a philosophical foundation, giving the study both direction and depth.
Leave a Reply